As ChatGPT continues to expand, OpenAI now offers seven different large language models (LLMs) to its paid users. These include GPT-4o, o3, o4-mini, o4-mini-high, GPT-4.5 (Research Preview), GPT-4.1, and GPT-4.1-mini. Each has its own design goals and use cases, and subscribers are required to pick a single model for each session.
Choosing the right model has become more complex, especially for users without technical backgrounds or prior experience with these systems. While advanced/experienced users may understand how each model performs in various tasks, many others are left unsure which model best suits their needs.
OpenAI appears to be preparing a feature to address this gap. Recent posts on social media platforms from individuals involved in the AI community suggest that a “router” is in development. This tool would automatically assign the most appropriate LLM to a user’s query, based on the content of that input.
Image: Lisan al Gaib / X
Though OpenAI has not officially confirmed the feature, discussions among developers and AI researchers imply that the system may already be undergoing internal tests. The proposed router would identify whether a task requires logical reasoning, creative generation, or integration with external tools, and would match that task to a suitable model.
This capability would resemble other AI systems like Token Monster, which already uses multiple third-party models in combination to formulate responses. However, integrating such a system directly into ChatGPT could simplify the experience for millions of users, especially those unfamiliar with model-specific strengths.
Historically, OpenAI has published guidance when releasing new models. For instance, the o-series models, o3, o4-mini, and o4-mini-high, have been associated with better performance in math, coding, and scientific tasks. In contrast, models like GPT-4.5 and GPT-4.1 appear to perform more consistently in creative writing and general communication. Despite this documentation, most casual users don’t review benchmarks or compare outputs across models.
The current manual system assumes users know which options exist and understand when to switch. This has created an overload of choice. Without direction, many end up using a default or familiar model, even if it may not be the best one for the task.
Introducing an automatic model selector could reduce this friction. It could allow users to interact with ChatGPT more naturally, without needing to evaluate model specifications first. In fields like healthcare, where accurate model selection could affect outcomes, this change might hold particular importance.
Broader adoption of such routing tools could also influence perceptions of AI’s usefulness. OpenAI reported 500 million active ChatGPT users in March. If those users received more tailored responses through automated model matching, their satisfaction with the tool might increase. In turn, that could drive higher usage across both individuals and enterprises.
At present, the tool remains unannounced. No public timeline has been shared, and OpenAI has not issued a statement in response to recent speculation.
For now, the choice remains manual. But if OpenAI moves forward with this system, it may help reduce confusion and make ChatGPT easier to navigate, especially for those unfamiliar with LLMs or lacking time to experiment. With the complexity of AI tools increasing, systems that simplify the user experience could play a key role in making them more accessible.
Read next: Lenovo, HP, and Dell Lead Global PC Recovery as Laptop Sales Rebound
Choosing the right model has become more complex, especially for users without technical backgrounds or prior experience with these systems. While advanced/experienced users may understand how each model performs in various tasks, many others are left unsure which model best suits their needs.
OpenAI appears to be preparing a feature to address this gap. Recent posts on social media platforms from individuals involved in the AI community suggest that a “router” is in development. This tool would automatically assign the most appropriate LLM to a user’s query, based on the content of that input.
Image: Lisan al Gaib / X
Though OpenAI has not officially confirmed the feature, discussions among developers and AI researchers imply that the system may already be undergoing internal tests. The proposed router would identify whether a task requires logical reasoning, creative generation, or integration with external tools, and would match that task to a suitable model.
This capability would resemble other AI systems like Token Monster, which already uses multiple third-party models in combination to formulate responses. However, integrating such a system directly into ChatGPT could simplify the experience for millions of users, especially those unfamiliar with model-specific strengths.
Historically, OpenAI has published guidance when releasing new models. For instance, the o-series models, o3, o4-mini, and o4-mini-high, have been associated with better performance in math, coding, and scientific tasks. In contrast, models like GPT-4.5 and GPT-4.1 appear to perform more consistently in creative writing and general communication. Despite this documentation, most casual users don’t review benchmarks or compare outputs across models.
The current manual system assumes users know which options exist and understand when to switch. This has created an overload of choice. Without direction, many end up using a default or familiar model, even if it may not be the best one for the task.
Introducing an automatic model selector could reduce this friction. It could allow users to interact with ChatGPT more naturally, without needing to evaluate model specifications first. In fields like healthcare, where accurate model selection could affect outcomes, this change might hold particular importance.
Broader adoption of such routing tools could also influence perceptions of AI’s usefulness. OpenAI reported 500 million active ChatGPT users in March. If those users received more tailored responses through automated model matching, their satisfaction with the tool might increase. In turn, that could drive higher usage across both individuals and enterprises.
At present, the tool remains unannounced. No public timeline has been shared, and OpenAI has not issued a statement in response to recent speculation.
For now, the choice remains manual. But if OpenAI moves forward with this system, it may help reduce confusion and make ChatGPT easier to navigate, especially for those unfamiliar with LLMs or lacking time to experiment. With the complexity of AI tools increasing, systems that simplify the user experience could play a key role in making them more accessible.
Read next: Lenovo, HP, and Dell Lead Global PC Recovery as Laptop Sales Rebound
