Tech Giants Challenge Utah's Parental Control Laws - A Clash of Rights and Responsibilities

A top-of-the-line trading group that represents leading tech giants Meta, X, and TikTok is rolling out a new lawsuit to prevent the American state of Utah from taking on excessive parental control laws.

As per a recently circulated document on the matter, the trading group says the efforts are designed to keep the state in check and stop them from rolling out laws that are designed to give parents more rights over their kids’ social media use.

To be more specific, the state laws in question have to do with HB311 and SB152 which are designed to guarantee protection for all children from the adverse effects having to do with using the leading platforms online.

A part of those clauses includes the addition of a new digital curfew taking place between 10:30 pm to 6:30am. This would provide both parents and any guardians complete visibility of what their child is doing and any kind of activity taking place online.

Moreover, it would force social media apps to get parental consent for designing profiles for users who are yet to turn 18 years old.

As per reports generated by NetChoice, the company claims the legislation is designed for the benefit of young users. However, they tend to violate the rights of the Utah citizens, their kids, and their respective companies. This also means an additional compromise for data security while stripping away the rights belonging to parents.

The laws would come into effect by the start of March next year and will entail those services having a user base that exceeds 10 million people. Meanwhile, this particular lawsuit is designed to prevent such acts from coming into effect. As noted by the group, they’ve already won a huge number of challenges arising against the state of California as well as Arkansas while making efforts to impose restrictions of such kinds.

When the laws come into effect, the parent will now have the right to take part in legal action against any platform for damages to minor users. This might have to do with addictions and any harm that’s physical, emotional, or financial due to the platform in question.

Meanwhile, those individuals who are below the age of 16 will have harm designated under the state law while those accused would need to prove how they were not involved or else face the consequences that may include fines going up to $250K for addictive design endeavors and close to $2500 for each child involved.

The news caused panic and outcry when the state governor of Utah argued how the figures for young users suffering from mental health issues were on the rise. This was related to social media firms not keeping a check on what’s taking place on their own apps or perhaps even turning a blind eye to the matter.

Governor Spencer Cox added how there is a huge responsibility that rests on the shoulders of both parents as well the state leaders that must keep kids’ security as their top priority.

It was definitely an eye-opening effect for Meta who was sued by the state of Utah for allegedly creating apps that served as traps for the youth. It claimed that the platforms result in excessive mental health concerns while deceiving guardians by keeping them in the dark and falsely giving hope that everything is well guarded when the reality is far from that.

In the same manner, TikTok was also sued for the use of addictive apps that expose children to content that is not only distressing but also violent in nature, thanks to the recommendations generated by the search engine in this regard.

But NetChoice fails to pay heed and justifies the apps by adding how the families are responsible for the safety of their kids and also have the best educational material available to them that can provide them with knowledge about how to enhance the protection and privacy of young users online.

As per reports from a media outlet, the Governor anticipated the lawsuits and vows to not back down, no matter how much pressure arises from the tech giants involved.

Photo: DIW - AIgen

Read next: Google Agrees To $700 Million Payout And Minor Concessions To Play Store After Illegal Monopoly Accusations
Previous Post Next Post