That thought, he explained, is more than a hypothetical. It’s a working idea guiding how his team designs the structure of future AI systems and the companies that will use them. When asked how far off that scenario might be, Altman didn’t hesitate: “Any significant division… mostly run by the AIs? Some small single-digit number of years. Not very far.”
Those words suggest that AI-led departments may appear sooner than expected. The concept isn’t that a model simply issues commands, but that advanced systems can coordinate tasks, evaluate performance, and distribute resources across teams. The early phase could involve AI managing logistics or analytics before expanding into decision-making roles. Altman’s framing positions this not as science fiction but as a near-term management experiment in progress.
From Departments to the CEO’s Desk
Altman extended the idea beyond departments. He said, “You’ll have billion-dollar companies run by two or three people with AI… maybe in two and a half years.” The prediction underlines how automation could cut operational overhead while allowing humans to focus on creativity and oversight.
This gradual handover would likely start in areas such as finance and operations, where data defines most decisions. Once AI systems prove reliable in those spaces, the model could extend toward top-level management, where a machine might help coordinate objectives across the company. But Altman admitted the public role of a chief executive, what he called the “politician part”, will be harder to replace. An AI may outperform humans in analytical reasoning, but people still prefer leadership they can emotionally recognize.
He said the delay will come less from technology than from trust: “People have a great deal higher trust in other people over AI, even if they shouldn’t.” In other words, the biggest obstacle to machine-led leadership won’t be code but comfort. For now, the social willingness to let algorithms make binding organizational decisions remains limited, even as the systems themselves grow increasingly capable.
Automation of Decision-Making, Not Just Work
Beyond capability, Altman’s scenario raises questions that technology alone can’t answer. Leadership is not just logic. It involves moral reasoning, empathy, and accountability, areas where AI still operates without an internal sense of right or wrong. A machine can optimize for targets, but it cannot yet grasp ethical trade-offs. If an AI were to run a company, its moral compass would be only as sound as the data and objectives programmed into it.
Altman treats this issue as an evolving design challenge. He sees the “AI CEO” as a useful thought experiment that helps researchers think about delegation, responsibility, and control. He didn’t describe it as a distant fantasy but as a concrete next step in exploring what parts of management can be automated safely.
That experiment, if it happens, would mark a new phase in corporate design - one where governance becomes partly computational. The key moral question is whether intelligence alone qualifies something to lead. The first AI-run company, when it appears, will test not only how far automation can go but how much humanity we’re willing to give up in pursuit of efficiency.
Notes: This post was edited/created using GenAI tools.
Read next: OpenAI Hits One Million Business Clients as New Usage Rules Redefine AI Boundaries
