CapCut, a go-to video editing app for millions, has introduced a quiet but sweeping change to its terms of service. While many use the tool to make quick edits for TikTok, Instagram Reels, or YouTube Shorts, the fine print now reveals a wide gap between what users think they’re doing — and what rights they’re actually giving away.
The update, published on June 12, grants CapCut and its partners the right to use, modify, and share any uploaded content freely, across the globe, forever. Users agree to this automatically just by opening the app and uploading their clips. No alert. No payout. No way to opt out. The platform now treats all content as non-confidential, with no obligation to keep anything private or original to the creator.
This change may go unnoticed by most casual users, but it touches nearly every type of content — from product videos and brand collaborations to comedy sketches, tutorials, and even family moments. CapCut now reserves the right to reuse or redistribute videos without seeking permission or crediting the original creator. And that includes using faces, voices, or usernames in promotions or ads.
A Risk That Scales With Popularity
For creators trying to build a personal brand or monetize their content, these terms pose a clear problem. Every sketch, review, or sponsored video uploaded to CapCut could be reused by a third party — or even turned into an ad — without warning. For someone earning income through views, brand identity, or licensing deals, this introduces real financial risk.
It also cuts into creative control. If CapCut can remix a video or insert it into another product’s promotion, the original message or intent might be lost. Worse, it could reflect poorly on the creator if taken out of context.
For small businesses, the stakes are even higher. Many use CapCut to make product demos, customer reels, or ads on a budget. Now, the same footage could be reused elsewhere, including by a rival brand or by CapCut’s corporate partners. The terms offer no guarantee that the original creator has any control over how or where that content appears.
Journalists Face a Different Kind of Exposure
CapCut’s growing use in newsrooms adds another layer of concern. Many reporters, especially those working with minimal gear in the field, rely on the app to edit footage for vertical formats. Its quick workflow and free tools help teams keep up with modern platforms — but that same workflow could now compromise confidentiality, especially with sensitive footage.
Any video edited or uploaded to CapCut is now considered open and reusable, even if it contains private interviews, raw field reporting, or embargoed material. The platform also claims the right to identify users publicly in connection with that content, including their faces and voices. This could put journalists at risk, especially in places where press freedom is limited or surveillance is high.
Not Just Legalese — Real-World Consequences
Some might argue these risks are theoretical. But users have seen this pattern before. Major platforms introduce terms quietly, rely on passive acceptance, and later invoke those permissions when it's too late to push back.
Earlier in 2024, Adobe faced similar blowback when its Creative Cloud policy claimed the right to view and analyze user content. The response was fast and loud. Adobe clarified its stance and promised not to train AI with customer data without consent. So far, CapCut hasn’t offered similar transparency.
What makes this situation more pressing is the lack of alternatives. Many users turn to CapCut because it’s easy, fast, and free. For young creators, independent businesses, or mobile journalists, it often fills a gap left by expensive desktop software. But free doesn’t mean free from cost. If the tradeoff is losing creative rights, the convenience may not be worth it.
What Users Can Do Now
For creators, journalists, and everyday users, this moment calls for a reset. It’s time to treat terms of service like contracts — because that’s exactly what they are. Before uploading to CapCut, ask what footage could be reused. If it’s personal, branded, sensitive, or monetized elsewhere, it might be safer to finish edits offline and upload only the final version.
Creators should back up original files, keep licensing clear, and avoid uploading anything they wouldn’t want shared beyond their control. Small businesses should review how they produce and edit marketing content. News teams need stricter guardrails and updated guidance for staff using third-party tools.
CapCut may still adjust its terms in response to feedback. But until that happens, users are left to protect themselves. The illusion of privacy and control no longer holds — not when the terms say otherwise.
Tools Aren’t Neutral
Apps like CapCut shape the way people create and share. They’re not just passive platforms; they come with rules, risks, and consequences. Whether you’re building a brand, running a newsroom, or simply editing a memory, the tools you use are part of the story. And knowing who controls what happens after you hit upload might be the most important part.
Image: appshunter / Unsplash
Read next: Malware Hidden in App Store Clones Is Draining Crypto Wallets by Stealing Photos
