A new analysis suggests Google’s AI-generated summaries increasingly steer users toward internal content, deepening a closed-loop environment that subtly discourages navigation beyond its platform.
A study by SE Ranking examined the frequency of these AI summaries in search results across multiple U.S. states. The results were striking: nearly 50% of AI-generated responses contained links redirecting users to Google’s own pages, with each summary typically embedding between four and six of these internal links.
These findings mirror broader patterns showing users click around within Google several times before exiting. Observers view this as a calculated attempt to stretch user engagement while minimizing outbound movement.
This behavior adds weight to ongoing claims that Google is shaping a walled experience. A separate analysis by Momentic also pointed out that users now click around 10 times within Google before heading to another site. These internal loops align with rising AI integration, where detailed queries more often trigger summary answers.
Despite the closed-loop behavior, Google still plays a central role in external traffic. March saw the platform direct over 175 million outbound visits, though per-user efficiency lagged behind AI competitors. ChatGPT, by comparison, prompted more than twice as many external visits per user session.
The SE Ranking report also identified notable patterns tied to keyword traits. AI-driven summaries rarely appear alongside highly competitive or expensive keywords. For instance, terms with high bidding costs showed a low presence of AI results, while medium-range keywords triggered summaries far more frequently.
Industry-wise, fashion, e-commerce, and political news saw minimal AI inclusion. Meanwhile, results tied to practical or moderately technical queries were more likely to trigger summary-driven responses.
The length of an AI-generated response often matched the number of sources it referenced. Brief summaries cited fewer sources, while longer answers drew from a wider variety of domains — some including over twenty distinct sites.
A study by SE Ranking examined the frequency of these AI summaries in search results across multiple U.S. states. The results were striking: nearly 50% of AI-generated responses contained links redirecting users to Google’s own pages, with each summary typically embedding between four and six of these internal links.
These findings mirror broader patterns showing users click around within Google several times before exiting. Observers view this as a calculated attempt to stretch user engagement while minimizing outbound movement.
The analysis drew from keyword data across five key U.S. regions including New York, California, Washington D.C., Texas, and Colorado. Google’s own site topped the list as the most frequently referenced destination in AI-generated responses, far outpacing platforms like YouTube, Reddit, Quora, and Wikipedia.
In total, over 140,000 AI-driven results were examined. Of these, approximately 43.42% directed users back to Google's own pages, with the remaining 56.58% pointing elsewhere.
This behavior adds weight to ongoing claims that Google is shaping a walled experience. A separate analysis by Momentic also pointed out that users now click around 10 times within Google before heading to another site. These internal loops align with rising AI integration, where detailed queries more often trigger summary answers.
Despite the closed-loop behavior, Google still plays a central role in external traffic. March saw the platform direct over 175 million outbound visits, though per-user efficiency lagged behind AI competitors. ChatGPT, by comparison, prompted more than twice as many external visits per user session.
The SE Ranking report also identified notable patterns tied to keyword traits. AI-driven summaries rarely appear alongside highly competitive or expensive keywords. For instance, terms with high bidding costs showed a low presence of AI results, while medium-range keywords triggered summaries far more frequently.
Industry-wise, fashion, e-commerce, and political news saw minimal AI inclusion. Meanwhile, results tied to practical or moderately technical queries were more likely to trigger summary-driven responses.
The length of an AI-generated response often matched the number of sources it referenced. Brief summaries cited fewer sources, while longer answers drew from a wider variety of domains — some including over twenty distinct sites.
This evolving pattern suggests that AI summaries are transitioning from a supplemental tool to a central feature of user interaction. Digital experts are now advising publishers to rethink their strategies, focusing not only on broad website visibility but also on staying prominent within Google's ever-expanding search landscape.
Read next: Advanced Reasoning AI May Face Limits by 2026 Warns Epoch Report
Read next: Advanced Reasoning AI May Face Limits by 2026 Warns Epoch Report
