The rise of AI has created a host of exciting opportunities because of the fact that this is the sort of thing that could potentially end up boosting human talents and allowing us to fulfil our true potential. However, there are certain issues that might arise, with many pointing to how AI might replace human beings in certain jobs thereby leaving them unemployed.
In spite of the fact that this is the case, many are touting AI not as a replacement for humans but as an enhancement. Google’s Chief Decision Scientist, Cassie Kozyrkov, recently stated that AI is not exactly new, since it has been utilized in search engines and other areas for quite some time now. She managed to use AI as a huge creativity enhancement tool, but she also pointed to another issue with AI that many are not aware of.
With all of that having been said and now out of the way, it is important to note that the distribution of AI tools might not be all that equal across the economic spectrum. People in positions of privilege as well as power may be able to get a headstart with access to such tools, and that would allow them to increase the gap between themselves and those less fortunate faster than might have been the case otherwise.
Locking AI tools behind subscription fees would most certainly lead to issues with access. Free and fair distribution of AI tools is crucial, otherwise it will only serve the upper classes instead of the people that might need it the most with all things having been considered and taken into account.
It will be interesting to see how these statements might impact the trajectory of the future of AI. It is already developing at a break neck pace, but the unprecedented nature of this technology as well as its rate of growth raises some pertinent questions. All eyes will be on AI companies like OpenAI to see how they rise to the challenge and make their AI tools open and accessible for all who might benefit from it.
Read next: AI Chatbots Are Taking Over The World As Downloads Reach Millions Across The App Store
In spite of the fact that this is the case, many are touting AI not as a replacement for humans but as an enhancement. Google’s Chief Decision Scientist, Cassie Kozyrkov, recently stated that AI is not exactly new, since it has been utilized in search engines and other areas for quite some time now. She managed to use AI as a huge creativity enhancement tool, but she also pointed to another issue with AI that many are not aware of.
With all of that having been said and now out of the way, it is important to note that the distribution of AI tools might not be all that equal across the economic spectrum. People in positions of privilege as well as power may be able to get a headstart with access to such tools, and that would allow them to increase the gap between themselves and those less fortunate faster than might have been the case otherwise.
Locking AI tools behind subscription fees would most certainly lead to issues with access. Free and fair distribution of AI tools is crucial, otherwise it will only serve the upper classes instead of the people that might need it the most with all things having been considered and taken into account.
It will be interesting to see how these statements might impact the trajectory of the future of AI. It is already developing at a break neck pace, but the unprecedented nature of this technology as well as its rate of growth raises some pertinent questions. All eyes will be on AI companies like OpenAI to see how they rise to the challenge and make their AI tools open and accessible for all who might benefit from it.
Read next: AI Chatbots Are Taking Over The World As Downloads Reach Millions Across The App Store
